𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀺𑀬𑀸
Prakrit
Alternative forms
- 𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀻 (uddehī)
Etymology
Inherited from Sanskrit 𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀺𑀓𑀸 (uddehikā)
Noun
𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀺𑀬𑀸 (uddehiyā) f (Devanagari उद्देहिया)
- termite, white ant
- c. 1088 – 1173, Hemachandra, Jīva-Vicāra 16-17:
- 𑀕𑁄𑀫𑀻 𑀫𑀁𑀓𑀡 𑀚𑀽𑀆 𑀧𑀺𑀧𑀻𑀮𑀺 𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀺𑀬𑀸 𑀬 𑀫𑀓𑁆𑀓𑁄𑀟𑀸
𑀇𑀮𑁆𑀮𑀺𑀬 𑀖𑀬𑀫𑀺𑀮𑁆𑀮𑀻𑀑 𑀲𑀸𑀯𑀬 𑀕𑁄𑀓𑀻𑀟 𑀚𑀸𑀈𑀑 𑁈𑁧𑁬𑁈
𑀕𑀤𑁆𑀤𑀳𑀬 𑀘𑁄𑀭𑀓𑀻𑀟𑀸 𑀕𑁄𑀫𑀬𑀓𑀻𑀟𑀸 𑀬 𑀥𑀦𑁆𑀦𑀓𑀻𑀟𑀸 𑀬
𑀓𑀼𑀁𑀣𑀼 𑀕𑁄𑀯𑀸𑀮𑀺𑀬 𑀇𑀮𑀺𑀬𑀸 𑀢𑁂𑀇𑀁𑀤𑀺𑀬 𑀇𑀁𑀤𑀕𑁄𑀯𑀸𑀈 𑁈𑁧𑁭𑁈- gomī maṃkaṇa jūā pipīli uddehiyā ya makkoḍā
illiya ghayamillīo sāvaya gokīḍa jāīo .16.
gaddahaya corakīḍā gomayakīḍā ya dhannakīḍā ya
kuṃthu govāliya iliyā teiṃdiya iṃdagovāī .17.
- 2004 translation
- Centipede, bug, louse, ant, termite, black ant, ial, ghimel, sava, gingoda, gaddhaiya,
excreta worms, dung worms, grain worms, kanthva, gopalika, snail etc. are Teindriya living beings.
- Centipede, bug, louse, ant, termite, black ant, ial, ghimel, sava, gingoda, gaddhaiya,
- gomī maṃkaṇa jūā pipīli uddehiyā ya makkoḍā
- 𑀕𑁄𑀫𑀻 𑀫𑀁𑀓𑀡 𑀚𑀽𑀆 𑀧𑀺𑀧𑀻𑀮𑀺 𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀺𑀬𑀸 𑀬 𑀫𑀓𑁆𑀓𑁄𑀟𑀸
Derived terms
- *𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀺𑀬𑀸-𑀇𑀮𑁆𑀮 (*uddehiyā-illa)
- Marathi: udhel (“pockpitted”)
- Devanagari: उधेल
- Modi: 𑘄𑘠𑘹𑘩
- Marathi: udhel (“pockpitted”)
- *𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀺𑀬𑀸-𑀇𑀮𑁆𑀮-𑀕 ~ *𑀉𑀤𑁆𑀤𑁂𑀳𑀺𑀬𑀸-𑀇𑀮𑁆𑀮-𑀬 (*uddehiyā-illa-ga ~ *uddehiyā-illa-ya)
- Gujarati: ઉધાયેલું (udhāyelũ, “eaten by termites”)
Descendants
Descendants
- Northwestern:
- Sindhi: ud̤ohī
- Arabic: اُڏوهِي
- Devanagari: उॾोही
- Khudawadi: 𑊴𑋉𑋧𑋞𑋢
- Sindhi: ud̤ohī
- Southern:
- Marathi: udhaī
- Devanagari: उधई
- Modi: 𑘄𑘠𑘃
- Varhadi: udaī, udhaī, udhḷī
- Devanagari: उदई, उधई, उधळी
- Modi: 𑘄𑘟𑘃, 𑘄𑘠𑘃, 𑘄𑘠𑘯𑘲
- Marathi: udhaī
- Western:
- Ahirani: उधई (udhaī)
- Middle Gujarati: उदेही, ऊदेही
- Gujarati: ઊધઈ (ūdhaī)
- Marwari:
- Devanagari: उदाई (udāī), ऊदेइ (ūdei)
- Mahajani: 𑅒𑅥𑅑 (udi), 𑅒𑅥𑅓𑅑 (udei)
- Nimadi: उधइ (udhai)
References
- Sheth, Hargovind Das T[rikamcand] (1923-1928), “उद्देहिया उद्देही”, in पाइअ-सद्द-महण्णवो [Pāia-Sadda-Mahaṇṇavo; lit. Ocean of Prakrit words] (in Hindi), Calcutta: [Published by the Author], page 161.
- Turner, Ralph Lilley (1969–1985), “upadīˊka”, in A Comparative Dictionary of the Indo-Aryan Languages, London: Oxford University Press, page 102