Reconstruction:Proto-Slavic/běaše

This Proto-Slavic entry contains reconstructed words and roots. As such, the term(s) in this entry are not directly attested, but are hypothesized to have existed based on comparative evidence.

Proto-Slavic

Etymology

(This etymology is missing or incomplete. Please add to it, or discuss it at the Etymology scriptorium.)

Verb

*běaše

second-person singular imperfective imperfect of *byti
Synonym: *bě
third-person singular imperfective imperfect of *byti
Synonym: *bě

Descendants

East Slavic:
- Old Novgorodian: бѣше (бьшь) (běše (bĭšĭ))
South Slavic:
- Old Church Slavonic: бѣаше (běaše)[1], бѣѣше (běěše)[2], бѣше (běše)[3][4]
- Bulgarian: бе́ше (béše)
- Macedonian: беше (beše)
- Serbo-Croatian:
  Unspecified: [Term?][5]
West Slavic:
- Old Czech: bieše (byeſe/byeſſe/nebieſſe/bijeſſe), bieš (bies/bieſ/byeſſ)[6]
- Old Polish: biesze (bese/?besze)[7]
- Sorbian:
  - Upper Sorbian: běše[8]
  - Lower Sorbian: běšo[9]

References

Ретъко, editor (1025±50?), “бѣаше”, in Codex Suprasliensis (in Old Church Slavonic), page 123, line 26
Ретъко, editor (1025±50?), “бѣѣше”, in Codex Suprasliensis (in Old Church Slavonic), page 46, line 30
Сава, editor (1050±50), “бѣше (line 7, page 172)”, in Sava's book (in Old Church Slavonic), page Jn:12:2
А. К. Поливанова, editor (2013), “§545. Морфология форм аориста и имперфекта”, in Старославянский язык. Грамматика. Словари. (in Russian), Moscow: Университет Дмитрия Пожарского, page 330
Đuro Daničić, editor (1880-1882), “a. bȉjȃh”, in Rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika (in Serbo-Croatian), volume 1, Zagreb: JAZU, page 360
Jan Gebauer (1886), “Tvaroslovné výklady a doklady ke slovesům třídy IV, VI a bezpříznakým. Kmeny praesentní bez příznaku.”, in Listy filologické a paedagogické, volume 13, Prague: Jednota českých filologů, Edvard Grégr, page 307
K. Nitsch, editor (1954), “1. Być”, in Słownik staropolski (in Old Polish), volume 1, Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences, page 187
Křesćan Pful, editor (1866), “być”, in Łužiski serbski słownik / Lausitzisch Wendisches Wörterbuch (in German), Budyšin: Maćica Serbska, page 57
Arnošt Muka (1921), “byś”, in Słownik dolnoserbskeje rěcy a jeje narěcow (in German, Russian), volume 1, St. Petersburg: ОРЯС РАН, page 102; Reprinted (in German)Bautzen: Domowina-Verlag, 2008

[1] Ретъко, editor (1025±50?), “бѣаше”, in Codex Suprasliensis (in Old Church Slavonic), page 123, line 26

[2] Ретъко, editor (1025±50?), “бѣѣше”, in Codex Suprasliensis (in Old Church Slavonic), page 46, line 30

[3] Сава, editor (1050±50), “бѣше (line 7, page 172)”, in Sava's book (in Old Church Slavonic), page Jn:12:2

[4] А. К. Поливанова, editor (2013), “§545. Морфология форм аориста и имперфекта”, in Старославянский язык. Грамматика. Словари. (in Russian), Moscow: Университет Дмитрия Пожарского, page 330

[5] Đuro Daničić, editor (1880-1882), “a. bȉjȃh”, in Rječnik hrvatskoga ili srpskoga jezika (in Serbo-Croatian), volume 1, Zagreb: JAZU, page 360

[6] Jan Gebauer (1886), “Tvaroslovné výklady a doklady ke slovesům třídy IV, VI a bezpříznakým. Kmeny praesentní bez příznaku.”, in Listy filologické a paedagogické, volume 13, Prague: Jednota českých filologů, Edvard Grégr, page 307

[7] K. Nitsch, editor (1954), “1. Być”, in Słownik staropolski (in Old Polish), volume 1, Warsaw: Polish Academy of Sciences, page 187

[8] Křesćan Pful, editor (1866), “być”, in Łužiski serbski słownik / Lausitzisch Wendisches Wörterbuch (in German), Budyšin: Maćica Serbska, page 57

[9] Arnošt Muka (1921), “byś”, in Słownik dolnoserbskeje rěcy a jeje narěcow (in German, Russian), volume 1, St. Petersburg: ОРЯС РАН, page 102; Reprinted (in German)Bautzen: Domowina-Verlag, 2008