Lincolnomics

English

Etymology

Blend of Lincoln +‎ economics.

Noun

Lincolnomics (uncountable)

(US politics, rare) Economic policies associated with the administration of Abraham Lincoln, 1861–1865.
- 1982 November 14, “The missing message”, in Craig Klugman and Larry J. Hayes, editors, The Journal~Gazette, Fort Wayne, Ind.: Richard Inskeep, column 1:
  It’s little wonder the Republicans are always so anxious about midterm elections. They lost ground in the very first one — when Abraham Lincoln was in the White House, in 1862. The Democrats picked up 38 House seats in that election, and they might have won more if President Lincoln hadn’t used federal troops to intimidate the opposition in some of the border-state contests. Democrats even won a majority of the House seats from Lincoln’s home state of Illinois. Was it a signal to Washington that Lincolnomics had failed? Not at all.
- 1982 December 8, William D. Tammeus, The Kansas City Star, volume 103, number 69, Kansas City, Mo., page 16A:
  THE LITTLE boy next door reports that his class now is studying the Civil War and Lincolnomics.
- 1987 February 2, Charley Reese, “Today’s civil-rights and welfare groups would jump on Lincoln”, in The Orlando Sentinel, Orlando, Fla., page A-10, column 2:
  The only people practicing Lincolnomics these days are the Soviets, which may be why they can afford more missiles and tanks than we can despite a much smaller economy.

Related terms

Hoovernomics, Trumanomics, Kennedynomics, Johnsonomics, Nixonomics, Fordonomics, Carternomics, Reaganomics, Bushonomics, Clintonomics, Obamanomics, Trumponomics, Bidenomics

单词	Lincolnomics
释义	Lincolnomics English Etymology Blend of Lincoln +‎ economics. Noun Lincolnomics (uncountable) (US politics, rare) Economic policies associated with the administration of Abraham Lincoln, 1861–1865. 1982 November 14, “The missing message”, in Craig Klugman and Larry J. Hayes, editors, The Journal~Gazette, Fort Wayne, Ind.: Richard Inskeep, column 1: It’s little wonder the Republicans are always so anxious about midterm elections. They lost ground in the very first one — when Abraham Lincoln was in the White House, in 1862. The Democrats picked up 38 House seats in that election, and they might have won more if President Lincoln hadn’t used federal troops to intimidate the opposition in some of the border-state contests. Democrats even won a majority of the House seats from Lincoln’s home state of Illinois. Was it a signal to Washington that Lincolnomics had failed? Not at all. 1982 December 8, William D. Tammeus, The Kansas City Star, volume 103, number 69, Kansas City, Mo., page 16A: THE LITTLE boy next door reports that his class now is studying the Civil War and Lincolnomics. 1987 February 2, Charley Reese, “Today’s civil-rights and welfare groups would jump on Lincoln”, in The Orlando Sentinel, Orlando, Fla., page A-10, column 2: The only people practicing Lincolnomics these days are the Soviets, which may be why they can afford more missiles and tanks than we can despite a much smaller economy. Related terms Hoovernomics, Trumanomics, Kennedynomics, Johnsonomics, Nixonomics, Fordonomics, Carternomics, Reaganomics, Bushonomics, Clintonomics, Obamanomics, Trumponomics, Bidenomics
随便看	excerps excerpseram excerpseramus excerpserant excerpseras excerpserat excerpseratis excerpsere excerpserim excerpserimus excerpserint excerpseris excerpserit excerpseritis excerpsero excerpserunt excerpsi excerpsimus excerpsisse excerpsissem excerpsissemus excerpsissent excerpsisses excerpsisset excerpsissetis